The Regulator for Charities in England and Wales
(Version June 2004)
The data used in this report was derived from a review of 200 annual reports, financial statements and the annual reviews of larger charities with a 31 March 2003 year-end.
In addition an independent research company interviewed 1000 members of the public to canvass their views on the level and type of information that charities make available to their stakeholders.
Table 1: By type of charity
| Type of charity |
Governing instrument |
Number |
% |
| Limited company | Memorandum and Articles of Association |
147 |
74 |
| Incorporated under Royal Charter | Royal Charter |
18 |
9 |
| Trust | Trust Deed |
23 |
11 |
| Trust | Set up by Charity Commission Scheme |
8 |
4 |
| Trust | Established by Act of Parliament |
3 |
2 |
| Trust | Established by Deed Poll |
1 |
- |
|
Base 200 | |||
Table 2: By type of guidance complied with
| Guidance complied with |
Number |
% |
| Charity SORP only |
170 |
85 |
| NHS guidance and Charity SORP |
6 |
3 |
| Registered Social Landlord SORP |
23 |
12 |
| Higher & Further Education SORP |
1 |
- |
|
Base 200 | ||
| Activity |
Number |
% |
| Business & professional |
0 |
- |
| Civil rights, citizenship and law and order |
6 |
3 |
| Conservation and protection |
9 |
5 |
| Culture, Sport & recreation |
20 |
10 |
| Education, training and scientific research |
24 |
12 |
| Health & medical |
41 |
20 |
| Housing and Community Affairs |
28 |
14 |
| International activities |
12 |
6 |
| Philanthropic intermediation eg. grant making |
4 |
2 |
| Religion |
12 |
6 |
| Social services and relief |
44 |
22 |
|
Base 200 | ||
Table 4: By main source of income
| Main income source |
Number |
% |
| Donations, legacies and similar income |
39 |
20 |
| Membership income |
2 |
1 |
| Grants / fees from central or local government |
73 |
37 |
| Trading income |
76 |
38 |
| Investment income, including bank interest |
5 |
2 |
| Other |
5 |
2 |
|
Base 200 | ||
Table 5: By main type of charitable expenditure
| Main type of expenditure |
Number |
% |
| Providing financial assistance (e.g. grant awarding to individuals and/ or organisations) |
40 |
20 |
| Providing buildings/ facilities/ open space |
39 |
20 |
| Providing services (e.g. care/ counselling) |
93 |
47 |
| Providing advocacy/ advice/ information/ education |
14 |
7 |
| Acting as an umbrella/ resource body |
1 |
- |
| Sponsoring or undertaking research |
13 |
6 |
|
Base 200 | ||
Table 6: By production of an Annual Review
|
Number |
% | |
| Annual Reviews available for this study |
83 |
42 |
|
Base 200 | ||
Table 7: When did the charities file their Reports and Accounts?
|
Received by Charity Commission |
Approved and signed by Trustees | |||
|
Number |
% |
Number |
% | |
| May 2003 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
| June 2003 |
- |
- |
16 |
8 |
| July 2003 |
6 |
3 |
73 |
37 |
| August 2003 |
8 |
4 |
19 |
9 |
| September 2003 |
21 |
10 |
37 |
19 |
| October 2003 |
17 |
9 |
18 |
9 |
| November 2003 |
18 |
9 |
16 |
8 |
| December 2003 |
26 |
13 |
9 |
5 |
| January 2004 |
91 |
45 |
9 |
5 |
| February and March 2004 |
13 |
7 |
1 |
- |
| Trustees’ signatures not dated |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
|
Base 200 | ||||
Table 8: The stages leading up to the filing of Reports and Accounts
| Period from: |
Average days |
Longest period |
Shortest period |
|
Days |
Days |
Days | |
|
154 |
308 |
52 |
|
5 |
91 |
0 |
|
93 |
234 |
3 |
|
Total days (legal maximum 306) |
253 |
* Charities who did not submit signed accounts have been excluded.
Table 9: Presentation of Annual Reports
|
Yes |
|
No |
| |
|
Number |
% |
Number |
% | |
| Is the Annual Report easy to read and navigate? |
191 |
96 |
9 |
5 |
| Does the Annual Report contain the following: | ||||
|
17 |
9 |
183 |
92 |
|
34 |
17 |
166 |
83 |
|
20 |
10 |
180 |
90 |
|
Base 200 | ||||
Table 10: Disclosure of charity details
| Did the Annual Report disclose the following: |
Yes |
|
No |
|
|
Number |
% |
Number |
% | |
|
199 |
100 |
1 |
1 |
|
190 |
95 |
10 |
5 |
|
171 |
86 |
29 |
15 |
|
196 |
98 |
4 |
2 |
|
Base 200 | ||||
Table 11: Required and best practice disclosures
| How good was the information provided in the Annual Report on the following: |
Good detail, easy to find |
Some information |
A few details |
No details |
Not applicable |
|
Number |
Number |
Number |
Number |
Number | |
| a) Aims and objects (required disclosures) | |||||
| Statement of statutory objects of the charity |
161 (81%) |
19 (10%) |
8 (4%) |
12 (6%) |
- |
| Explanation of aims and mission of the charity |
152 (76%) |
28 (14%) |
15 (8%) |
5 (3%) |
- |
| b) Organisation (required disclosures) | |||||
| List of trustees at year end and who served during the year |
188 (94%) |
9 (5%) |
0 |
3 (2%) |
- |
| Details of how trustees are appointed |
78 (39%) |
43 (22%) |
35 (18%) |
44 (22%) |
- |
| Details of any body or person who can appoint the trustees |
63 (32%) |
44 (22%) |
30 (15%) |
63 (32%) |
- |
| Description of organisational structure |
74 (37%) |
64 (32%) |
47 (24%) |
15 (8%) |
- |
| c) Organisation (best practice disclosures) | |||||
| Details of committees, their composition and their areas of activity? |
56 (28%) |
51 (26%) |
38 (19%) |
53 (27%) |
2 (1%) |
| d) Relationships (required disclosures) | |||||
| Statement of relationship with related parties |
58 (29%) |
38 (19%) |
30 (15%) |
35 (18%) |
39 (20%) |
| Details of relationships with other charities and bodies |
49 (25%) |
37 (19%) |
45 (23%) |
62 (31%) |
7(4%) |
| e) Review of charity’s and subsidiaries’ activities (required disclosures) | |||||
| Achievements for the year |
126 (63%) |
46 (23%) |
15 (8%) |
13 (7%) |
- |
| Plans for the future |
66 (33%) |
47 (24%) |
58 (29%) |
29 (15%) |
- |
| Narrative about the effectiveness of fundraising |
61 (31%) |
33 (17%) |
42 (21%) |
43 (22%) |
21 (11%) |
| Narrative relating to the contribution of volunteers |
31 (16%) |
34 (17%) |
33 (17%) |
82 (41%) |
20 (10%) |
| Information provided about subsidiary companies |
40 (20%) |
22 (11%) |
23 (12%) |
55 (28%) |
60 (30%) |
| f) Finance (best practice disclosures) | |||||
| Comment on major sources of income and expenditure |
71 (36%) |
69 (35%) |
35 (18%) |
25 (13%) |
- |
| Comment on financial health |
61 (31%) |
63 (32%) |
54 (27%) |
22 (11%) |
- |
| Comment on unusual items (e.g. large deficit on defined benefit pension scheme.) |
46 (23%) |
17 (9%) |
15 (8%) |
70 (35%) |
52 (26%) |
| Comment on accounting policies and any changes to them |
27 (14%) |
26 (13%) |
26 (13%) |
121(61%) |
- |
| g) Performance (best practice disclosures) | |||||
| a) Does the Annual Report contain useful ratios? |
72 (36%) |
58 (29%) |
44 (22%) |
26 (13%) |
- |
| Is there an explanation of performance of key ratios? |
62 (31%) |
58 (29%) |
44 (22%) |
36 (18%) |
- |
| h) Reserves (required disclosures) | |||||
| Explanation of the charity’s policy on reserves |
131 (66%) |
33 (17%) |
17 (9%) |
19 (10%) |
- |
| Comment on achievement of policy and action to be taken |
77 (39%) |
49 (25%) |
33 (17%) |
41 (21%) |
- |
| Explanation of funds in deficit |
17 (9%) |
8 (4%) |
8 (4%) |
60 (30%) |
107 (54%) |
| i) Investments (required disclosures) | |||||
| Summary of specific investment powers |
41 (21%) |
19 (10%) |
34 (17%) |
106 (53%) |
- |
| Explanation of the charity’s investment policy |
70 (35%) |
28 (14%) |
25 (13%) |
61 (31%) |
16 (8%) |
| Comment on performance of investments |
37 (19%) |
24 (12%) |
22 (11%) |
95 (48%) |
22 (11%) |
| j) Grants (required disclosures) | |||||
| Explanation of grant making policies |
33 (17%) |
8 (4%) |
10 (5%) |
97 (49%) |
52 (26%) |
| k) Risk management (required disclosures) | |||||
| Statement concerning reviewing risks |
147 (74%) |
24 (12%) |
22 (11%) |
7 (4%) |
- |
| l) Risk management (best practice disclosures) | |||||
| Explanation of major risks |
15 (8%) |
12 (6%) |
28 (14%) |
145 (73%) |
- |
| Explanation of how major risks monitored / controlled |
95 (48%) |
42 (21%) |
42 (21%) |
21 (11%) |
- |
| m) Internal processes (best practice disclosures) | |||||
| Comment on staff and staffing levels? |
60 (30%) |
44 (22%) |
44 (22%) |
49 (25%) |
3 (2%) |
| Comment on its property assets? |
33 (17%) |
25 (13%) |
41 (21%) |
96 (48%) |
5 (3%) |
| Comments concerning the charity’s IT and systems? |
10 (5%) |
20 (10%) |
18 (9%) |
152 (76%) |
- |
|
Base 200 | |||||
Table 12: Outcomes and Impact described in the Annual Report
| To what extent does the Annual Report describe the following: |
Explained in detail |
|
Limited information |
|
No detail |
|
|
Number |
% |
Number |
% |
Number |
% | |
| What charity has done to achieve its objects? |
130 |
65 |
55 |
28 |
15 |
8 |
| Details of how its achievements compare to its plans? |
30 |
15 |
88 |
44 |
82 |
41 |
| Explanation of the benefit of this year’s activities to users? |
73 |
37 |
71 |
36 |
56 |
28 |
| Explanation of the benefit of this year’s activities on wider society? |
31 |
16 |
67 |
34 |
102 |
51 |
Table 13: Linkage between the Annual Report and other communication media
|
Charities producing these extra statements / having a website |
Annual Reports cross referring to the other statements / website | ||||
| Number (base) | Number - Yes |
% |
Number - No |
% | |
| If the Annual Report and Accounts booklet contains other statements (for example, a Chairman’s statement) does the Annual Report refer to them? |
49 |
24 |
49 |
25 |
51 |
| If the charity produces an Annual Review, does the Annual Report cross-refer to it? |
83 |
20 |
24 |
63 |
76 |
| If the charity has a web site, does the Annual Report refer to it? |
188 |
39 |
21 |
149 |
79 |
Table 14: Other comments on the Annual Reports
|
Number of charities | |
| Annual Report and Accounts booklet contains much detail, but in reports other than Annual Report |
9 |
| Report clearly laid out, concise and helpful |
15 |
| Report very brief and uninformative |
15 |
| Report contains excellent detail on aims, plans, policies and strategy |
8 |
| Report very strong on impact and achievements |
15 |
| Report strong on financial matters |
12 |
| Report weak on financial matters |
7 |
| Report weak on impact of charitable activity |
6 |
| Some honest details about problems |
9 |
| Particularly good detail on charity structure and organisation |
14 |
| Poor detail on charity structure and organisation |
9 |
Table 15: Key information in the financial statements
| Key Transparency and Accountability information |
Yes |
No |
Not applicable |
|
Number |
Number |
Number | |
| Is there an accounting policy for each major source of (consolidated) income, expenditure and balance sheet item? |
143 (72%) |
57 (29%) |
- |
| Is there a note explaining the composition of each major figure in the (consolidated) SoFA and balance sheet? |
125 (63%) |
75 (38%) |
- |
| Is there a note covering the amount of any remuneration to trustees, and the nature and amount of expenses reimbursed to them during the year? |
187 (94%) |
13 (7%) |
- |
| Is there adequate disclosure of related parties, and transactions and balances with them, particularly expenses that would normally have to be borne by an organisation but which are not included in the SoFA)? |
130 (65%) |
17 (9%) |
53 (27%) |
|
Base 200 | |||
Table 16: Most frequent missing or inadequate accounting policies
| Number of charities | |
| Incoming resources | |
|
10 |
|
5 |
|
3 |
|
10 |
|
3 |
| Outgoing resources | |
|
27 |
|
3 |
|
10 |
|
69 |
|
5 |
Table 17: Most frequent missing or inadequate notes to the financial statements
| Number of charities | |
| Incoming resources | |
|
17 |
|
16 |
|
28 |
|
11 |
| Outgoing resources | |
|
14 |
|
4 |
|
8 |
|
3 |
|
20 |
|
4 |
| Other | |
|
4 |
Table 18: Other comments on the Accounts
| Number of charities | |
| Income not properly categorised in the SoFA |
10 |
| Expenditure not properly classified in SoFA |
2 |
| Mathematical errors in the accounts |
3 |
| Balance sheet and auditors’ report not signed |
9 |
Table 19: How visually interesting are Annual Reviews?
|
Yes |
No | |
|
Number |
Number | |
| Is the current Annual Review written in a more accessible style than the Annual Report? |
69 (83%) |
14 (17%) |
| Does the current Annual Report contain the following: | ||
|
65 (78%) |
18 (22%) |
|
55 (66%) |
28 (34%) |
|
80 (96%) |
3 (4%) |
|
Base: 83 | ||
Table 20: Annual Review basics
|
Yes |
No | |
|
Number |
Number | |
| Did the Annual Review disclose that it covered the same period as the Annual Report? |
80 (96%) |
3 (4%) |
| Did the Annual Report contain summarised financial data? |
65 (78%) |
18 (22%) |
|
Base 83 | ||
Table 21: How informative was the Annual Review?
| Does the Annual Review provide information on: |
Information additional to Annual Report |
Information duplicates Annual Report |
No information |
|
Number |
Number |
Number | |
| Financial ratios |
29 (35%) |
32 (39%) |
22 (27%) |
| Headline figures |
50 (60%) |
26 (31%) |
7 (8%) |
| Impact information |
78 (94%) |
4 (5%) |
1(1%) |
| Outcome information |
77 (93%) |
5 (6%) |
1 (1%) |
| Future plans |
59 (71%) |
9 (11%) |
15 (18%) |
|
Base 83 | |||
Table 22: What was the perceived purpose of the Annual Review?
(Note: Some reviews appeared to have more than one purpose)
|
Apparent purpose of Annual Review |
Yes |
No |
|
Number |
Number | |
| Fundraising |
35 |
48 |
| General publicity |
64 |
19 |
| Enhancement to the Annual Report |
37 |
46 |
|
Base 83 | ||
Table 23: General perceptions and comments
|
Number of charities | |
| Annual Review much easier to read than the Annual Report |
8 |
| Annual Review more informative than the Annual Report |
12 |
| Annual Review fills in gaps in the Annual Report |
15 |
| Annual Review very long / heavy reading |
4 |
| Good use of individual cases to illustrate activities / outputs |
7 |
| Confusion caused because Annual Review entitled "Annual Report" even though a separate Trustees’ Annual Report existed |
4 |
| Annual Review very long and very heavy reading |
4 |
| Annual Review on website not for same year as Annual Report and Accounts |
10 |
Table 24: Other measures in place to enhance transparency and accountability
| Reference made by the charity in its Annual Report or Annual Review to the following: |
Number of charities |
| Website |
57 (29%) |
| Newsletter |
23 (12%) |
| Helpline, customer service centre, mini-cam, e-mail, telephone service, text messaging |
12 (6%) |
| Availability of publications, fact sheets, research papers |
8 (4%) |
| Documents such as Corporate Plan, and Annual Review on CD, available on request |
8 (4%) |
| Regular meetings with volunteers, advisory groups, tenants etc. |
3 (2%) |
|
Base 200 | |
Table 25: Respondents were asked how important they thought it was for charities to provide the following information. Respondents used a scale of 1 to 5 where 5 = very important, 1 = not at all important and 3 = neither important nor unimportant. The mean results from 1000 responses are shown below.
| Mean score | Information |
| 4.43 | Which charitable activities the charity has spent its money on |
| 4.41 | What the charity has achieved (i.e. the impact on society of the work they have undertaken) |
| 4.14 | The amount of money the charity spends on raising money (including the cost of fundraising staff) |
| 4.10 | The cost of the charity’s administration (including staffing costs) |
| 3.95 | The charity’s financial policies (e.g. investment policies and reserves) |
| 3.87 | How decisions are made in the charity and who makes them |
| 3.80 | Where the charity gets its income from (e.g. from donors/ grants/ investments/ fees etc.) |
| 3.40 | The charity’s registration number |
NOTE: In some instances percentages add up to more than 100% due to rounding up.
Transparency and Accountability: For the purposes of this report we interpret transparency and accountability as providing relevant and reliable information to stakeholders in a timely manner that is free from bias, comparable, understandable and focused on stakeholders’ legitimate needs. This means that the information provided is capable of being understood by users with a reasonable knowledge of business, economic activities and accounting and a willingness to study the information with reasonable diligence.
Accounting policies: the principles, bases, conventions and rules by which transactions are recognised, measured and presented in the accounts.
Accounts: the statement of accounts produced annually by a charity in compliance with the Charities Act 1993 or the Companies Act 1985 and the Charities SORP. Usually they comprise a Statement of Financial Activities, a Balance Sheet, a Cash Flow statement (where required), a statement of accounting policies and other notes. When audited, they have attached to them an auditors’ report.
Achievements: something accomplished by the charity.
Activities: anything done using resources belonging to the charity or under its control, and including all its work and services.
Aims: describe the changes the charity plans to achieve, or the differences it wants to make.
Annual Report: A report produced annually by the trustees of a charity, in compliance with legal requirements and the requirements of the Charities SORP, to provide legal and administrative details relating to the charity and to describe what it is trying to do and how it is going about it.
Annual Review: A review of a year’s activities produced by a charity in addition to its Annual Report. They are frequently more promotional in nature and may be more descriptive and less focused on performance reporting and linking to financial information. Others may provide detailed performance information relating to particular services and may include financial summaries.
For the purposes of this project an ‘Annual Review’ is any document that is:
Beneficiaries: persons, people or bodies who may benefit under charitable trusts.
Impact: the broad, longer-term effects of the charity's work.
Indicators: well-defined, easily measurable information, which shows how well the charity is performing.
Inputs: the resources and activities that are used in the charity to create the services offered, for example, staff and volunteers' time, use of equipment etc.
Mission statement: a short statement of the purpose of the charity, sometimes called an overall aim.
Objectives: the practical steps the charity will take to accomplish its aims.
Outcomes: the changes, benefits, learning or other effects that happen as a result of the charity's services or activities.
Outputs: the activities, services and products provided to users. They show the volume of work undertaken, representing the direct products of the charity arising from its activities.
Performance management: the use of performance measurement information to help set and report on performance goals.
Plan: a written description of the steps the charity will take to achieve certain things.
Services: the goods, information and activities the charity provides for its users.
Stakeholder: any person, group, or organisation that has an interest in, or expectation of the charity.
Strategic plan: covers the vision for the future of the charity and outlines the steps necessary to achieve this over a period of time, often three to five years.
Strategy: a planned way of achieving long-term aims.
Trends: show changes over time; can be used to plan future services.
Users: anyone who uses or benefits from a charity's services or facilities, whether provided on a voluntary basis or as a contractual service.
All registered charities in England and Wales are required to produce annual financial statements and an Annual Report and file them with the Charity Commission, unless the charity falls below the minimum size criteria set out in the Charities Act 1993 – having gross income and total expenditure of £10,000 or less. In addition, any charity that is a limited company must also prepare and file a directors’ report and annual financial statements at Companies House. A charity that also falls within the scope of another regulator (for example, a Registered Social Landlord, which is regulated by the Housing Corporation) is usually required by that regulator to prepare and file an annual report and accounts. So whichever category a charity falls into, unless it is very small, preparing and filing an annual trustees’/directors’ report and financial statements is a universal requirement.
The time limits for filing the annual report and accounts are also very similar between regulators. Registered charities must file their annual report and financial statements with the Charity Commission within ten months of the end of the financial year. A similar timescale exists for charities that are companies for filing these documents at Companies House. So for the 200 charities surveyed as part of this project, each of which had a 31 March 2003 financial year-end, the last filing date was 31 January 2004.
The minimum content of Trustees Annual Reports for charities in England and Wales is determined by Regulations issued under the Charities Act 1993. The Charities SORP (‘Statement of Recommended Practice: Accounting and Reporting by Charities’) provides some additional recommendations. Charitable Companies must also produce a directors’ report though this may be combined with the Trustees Annual Report to reduce duplication of information.
The format and content of charity financial statements is determined by the legislation under which the charity is constituted. Charities that are companies must comply with the accounting requirements of Companies Act 1985, and non-company charities must largely comply with requirements of the Charities Act 1993 and associated Reports and Accounts Regulations.
Both company and non-company charities preparing accruals accounts must prepare accounts that give a true and fair view. In order to do this the accounts must follow relevant accounting standards and any statement of recommended practice (SORP) that relates to the charity. A SORP is a document that provides the appropriate interpretation of accounting standards for the type of organisation concerned. Most charities are subject to the Charities SORP, though there are also SORPs for Registered Social Landlords, Authorised Funds (unit trusts) and Further and Higher Educational Institutions.
Accordingly the Charity Commission expects that charities will adhere to the SORP relevant to their circumstances.
The above requirements apply to charities’ annual reports and financial statements, effectively providing a minimum standard. But there are virtually no requirements applying to any additional material issued by a charity to report on its performance, such as a "glossy" annual review or material available on a website, unless they contain summarised financial statements. Where they do so, the SORP provides guidance on the form and content of the summarised financial statements and the Auditing Practices Board has issued Bulletins entitled "The auditors’ statement on the summary financial statements" (Bulletin 1999/6) and "The electronic publication of auditors’ reports" (Bulletin 2001/1).
Annex D – Bibliography
CaritasData, The Top 3000 Charities 2003.
Charity Commission, Accounting and Reporting by Charities, Statement of Recommended Practice. HMSO 2000.
Charity Commission, Accounting and Reporting by Charities, Statement of Recommended Practice Update Bulletin 1. HMSO 2003.
Charity Commission, Accounts aren't optional, Charity Commission News, issue 19, Autumn, 2003.
Charity Commission, Charity Reserves (RS3), 2003.
Charity Commission, Tell it like it is, Charity Commission News, issue 18, Summer, 2003.
Charity Commission, Charities and Risk Management, 2003.
Charity Finance Directors Group, Inputs Matter – Improving the quality of reporting in the charity sector, 2003.
Home Office, The Charities (Accounts and Reports) Core Guide, HMSO, 2000.
Home Office, The Charities (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 1995, HMSO, 1995.
Home Office, Charities Act 1993 c. -10. HMSO, 1993.
Home Office, Charities and Not-for Profits, a modern legal framework. The Government’s response to "Private Action, Public benefit", HMSO 2003.
PricewaterhouseCoopers, Value Reporting review 2003 – Transparency in corporate reporting, 2003.
Scott, N. Valuing Volunteers – the hidden asset, CIPA Spectrum, issue 4, March, 2004.
Strategy Unit, Private Action, Public Benefit – a review of Charities and the wider not-for profit sector, Cabinet Office, 2002.
We would like to thank everyone who has co-operated in the production of this report.
Special thanks in particular to members of the Charity Group of Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP for their assistance and to Paul Bussy (FCA) for his help and valuable insights in both framing the study and analysis of the results.