| |
1. The management committee |
| |
1.1 The composition of the committee 1.2 User trustees 1.3 Appointed members 1.4 Elected members 1.5 Co-opted members 1.6 Imbalance in the composition of the committee |
| |
|
| |
1.1 The composition of the committee |
| |
Village halls are usually run by a management committee. The composition of that committee will be set out in the governing document and normally includes: |
| |
- appointed members (previously known as representative members);
|
| |
|
| |
- co-opted (previously known as non-official members).
|
| |
These members are the trustees and are responsible for the management and administration of the charity. |
| |
Very occasionally we may find a village hall run by a self-perpetuating body of trustees. This usually means that there are no elected or nominated trustees, instead the trustees appoint new trustees to replace retiring ones. We cannot insist that such bodies change to a committee type structure, but if we are making a Scheme for a village hall with such a trustee body, we would certainly ask the trustees to consider the option of changing, particularly where there are problems with usage or attracting new trustees. |
| |
|
| |
1.2 User Trustees |
| |
The legal principle that a trustee should not benefit personally from his or her position as a trustee does not prevent a charity trustee of a village hall, which is for the benefit of the whole community, from enjoying the usual benefits of that charity, as a member of the community. Further information about beneficiaries who become trustees can be found in leaflet CC24 Users on Board. |
| |
|
| |
1.3 Appointed members |
| |
The governing document will usually name the organisations initially entitled to appoint members to the management committee. Because the village hall is intended for use by the whole community there could be a wide cross-section of organisations wishing to appoint members. Information about changing provisions for appointed members within the governing document can be found in section 3 of OG 68 B1. |
| |
Groups who use the facilities on a one-off or occasional basis should not expect to be included but those using the hall on a regular basis should be represented. |
| |
Where the appointing organisation is not established with RCA objects, its appointee could find that their duty to act in the hall's interests may conflict with their own interests or those of the organisation appointing them. This is most likely to be the case where the organisation concerned is a profit making one. |
| |
We should not therefore readily agree to the inclusion of such organisations where we are involved in agreeing the constitution of a hall's committee or advising on the issue of composition of the committee. There are however other organisations whose purposes are not fully in line with the RCA but, nevertheless, have purposes which have a wider benefit to the community and might therefore be appropriate for inclusion. Examples of these might be parish councils (or, in Wales, community councils), Parochial Church Councils or other religious groups and organisations with educational purposes such as an IT Resource Centre. |
| |
The usual requirements for appointed members are: |
| |
- that only one member is appointed by each organisation listed in the schedule to the governing document, unless very few organisations use the hall, when provision should be made for an equal number of appointments per organisation;
|
| |
- any appointment must be made according to the practice of the appointing body;
|
| |
- an appointment should not be made more than two months before the annual general meeting (ie when the vacancy arises).
|
| |
- The appointment will be effective from the latter of:
|
| |
|
- the end of the annual general meeting; or
|
| |
|
- the date on which the committee or their secretary or clerk are informed of the appointment.
|
| |
- the person being appointed need not be a member of the relevant appointing body.
|
| |
The appointed member must always act in the best interests of the village hall charity, rather than the narrower interests of the users they represent. Such members need to be aware of their potential conflict of interest and should absent themselves from those parts of committee meetings where issues relating to the interests of their appointing organisation are being discussed. This does not, of course, preclude the organisation from making representations to the committee. Where a matter affects all organisations equally, such as an across the board increase in hire charges, it would obviously not be practical for those affected to withdraw if this meant the meeting were to be inquorate. In these circumstances non-withdrawal would be acceptable to us, as individual organisations would be treated equally. |
| |
The committee does not have the power to reject a particular nomination from an organisation. However this would not apply where the individual is under eighteen or is disqualified for being a trustee under section 72 of the 1993 Act. |
| |
|
| |
1.4 Elected members |
| |
Elected members are those people who come forward in their own right to serve as committee members. They are appointed by the annual general meeting, usually by show of hands. We recommend that the number of elected members should be less than the number of representative members as this is a factor taken into consideration by grant makers and may help to prevent one particular faction taking control of the committee. |
| |
|
| |
1.5 Co-opted members |
| |
If the committee decides that certain people may be useful to the running of the charity, perhaps because they have a special skill or have past experience as a trustee, then they can be co-opted to join the committee. As co-opted members, they are elected by the committee and not the annual general meeting. Our own model Scheme allows for two co-opted members. Where other governing documents allow the appointment of co-opted trustees but do not stipulate the number, co-opted members should not exceed one third of the members of the committee. Whilst this is not a legal requirement it does ensure that the democratic balance of the committee is maintained and that grant givers can remain satisfied that those using the hall have a proper say in its running. |
| |
|
| |
1.6 Imbalance in the composition of the committee |
| |
The organisations who appoint members to the committee will normally be listed in the deed or Scheme itself or in a schedule. Over time the organisations using the hall can change and some may go out of existence. Older deeds and Schemes can lack the power to remove the right of moribund or defunct organisations to appoint members to the committee or even appoint new organisations without our approval. If the number of active organisations is less than the original number it could lead to a situation where the number of elected members exceed the number of appointed members. It is possible that this situation could jeopardise chances of receiving grant aid. See OG 68 B1 section 3 where the charity has no power in its governing document to change the composition of the management committee. |